Skip to content
Independently verified · Quarterly re-audit
EU VETTED
Alternatives to

European alternatives to Slack.

Salesforce-owned team messaging since 2021. Direct CLOUD Act exposure.

In short

Stackfield (Germany, Munich), Element/Matrix (UK, open source), and Wire (Switzerland) are the European alternatives to Slack on EU Vetted's editorial compliance score — all rated 5/5. Stackfield is the closest UX match to Slack with documented German hosting; Wire offers end-to-end encryption by default with Swiss data residency; Element/Matrix is the open-protocol, self-hostable option. Slack is a Salesforce subsidiary and runs on US infrastructure, placing it under CLOUD Act jurisdiction in practice.

ALTERNATIVES
4
CLOUD-ACT · NONE
2
WITH BSI C5
0
FREE TIER
0

DISCLOSURE   Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Compliance scores and editorial rankings are never influenced by affiliate relationships.

Why switch

Why look for a Slack alternative?

WHAT YOU'RE LEAVING

What are you leaving behind with Slack?

Listed for transparency. Every product on this page is benchmarked against this baseline.

Slack US-incorporated

Salesforce-owned team messaging since 2021. Direct CLOUD Act exposure.

SCORE
1.0/5
OWNERSHIP
US-OWNED
CLOUD ACT
DIRECT
HOSTING
Likely AWS · US
SCHREMS II
Default SCC + supp.
What you keep, what you give up

What do you keep, and what do you trade off?

SIDE-BY-SIDE

How do the 4 European alternatives to Slack compare?

All 4 alternatives ranked by compliance score, benchmarked against Slack.

Product Score Owner CLOUD Act Cert. Pricing Action
Slack
benchmark · US
1.0/5
SOC 2
no EU framework
Freemium your current
Stackfield
Germany
ISO/IEC 27001
C5
Paid
€9 / mo
View profile →
Wire
Switzerland
Paid View profile →
Element (Matrix)
United Kingdom
ISO/IEC 27001
Paid View profile →
Talkspirit
France
ISO/IEC 27001
Paid View profile →
Migration tips

How do you migrate from Slack?

TOP PICKS

Which are the closest Slack alternatives?

Ranked by feature parity + compliance score. Migration friction is weighted higher than feature breadth.

Stackfield
Germany · Founded 2012
★ #1 PICK

Munich-based E2E-encrypted collaboration suite (Stackfield GmbH, 2012); ISO 27001 + BSI C5, DE data centres, AES-256 in browser.

SCORE
5.0
FROM
€9/mo
CLOUD ACT
NONE
Wire
Switzerland · Founded 2012
★ #2 PICK

Swiss-headquartered enterprise messaging + video (Wire Swiss GmbH, Zug + Berlin), MLS E2EE, VS-NfD-ready, 90%+ European institutional ownership.

SCORE
5.0
FROM
CLOUD ACT
NONE
Element (Matrix)
United Kingdom · Founded 2017
★ #3 PICK

UK-headquartered open-source Matrix protocol commercialisation; powers Bundeswehr BwMessenger + French Tchap + NATO + UN.

SCORE
5.0
FROM
CLOUD ACT
MINOR
Picking the right one

Which Slack alternative should you pick?

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Slack usable under GDPR?
Slack publishes a Data Processing Addendum based on the EU Standard Contractual Clauses with post-Schrems II supplementary measures, so it is legally usable from the EU. The reason European procurement teams still look for alternatives is the underlying ownership and infrastructure profile: Slack Technologies LLC has been a subsidiary of Salesforce since 2021, the platform runs on Salesforce / AWS US infrastructure, and the consolidated structure means CLOUD Act jurisdiction applies. For a transfer impact assessment, that combination is what prompts the alternative search.
Why does this page only list three alternatives?
Team messaging is a thinner category in Europe than email or storage. The three mapped here (Stackfield in Germany, Element/Matrix in the UK, and Wire in Switzerland) are the European tools that meet our editorial bar for procurement-grade documentation, hosting transparency, and a published DPA. We will add Mattermost (US-based, EU-hostable) and Rocket.Chat (Brazil) when self-hostable on EU sovereign cloud; they exist but did not make the editorial cut for primary listings here. Curating thin is preferable to padding the list with tools that do not pass our verification.
Which Slack alternative is closest to Slack's UX?
Stackfield is the closest match to Slack's day-to-day interaction model: channels, threads, direct messages, file attachments, and integrations all map to familiar Slack equivalents. Element/Matrix runs on the open Matrix protocol with a more federated mental model; Wire is enterprise-grade with end-to-end encryption as the default. For teams that want a near-drop-in Slack replacement with German hosting, Stackfield is the start.
Can I export my Slack message history?
Workspace owners on Slack's paid tiers can export the full message history via *Settings → Workspace Settings → Import/Export Data*. The export comes as a ZIP file with per-channel JSON. Element/Matrix supports importing a Slack export directly via the *matrix-slack-bridge* tool; Stackfield offers a guided import service for paying customers. Wire's import is manual and works best for moving the active set of conversations rather than the full archive.
What about end-to-end encryption?
Wire and Element/Matrix both support end-to-end encryption by default: Wire as the standard and Element via the Megolm protocol on the Matrix backbone. Stackfield uses zero-knowledge encryption with German server-side keys. For teams where E2E is a hard requirement (legal practice, government work, regulated industries), Wire and Element are the two to evaluate first.
Does Slack fall under the US CLOUD Act?
In practice, yes. Slack Technologies LLC is a subsidiary of Salesforce, Inc., which is US-incorporated and publicly listed. The consolidated structure — including any EU-region data storage — falls within the reach of the US CLOUD Act, which can compel a US company to produce data it controls regardless of where it is stored. The alternatives rated 5/5 on this page (Stackfield, Element/Matrix, Wire) are either EU-owned, EU-hosted, or Swiss-hosted, each removing or substantially reducing that direct exposure. This is an assessment of corporate structure, not a claim about any specific data request.
What is the cheapest European alternative to Slack?
Stackfield's free tier covers up to 5 users with basic channel and messaging features. Element's open-source self-hosted route is free if your team has the hosting capacity on an EU cloud provider such as Scaleway or OVH. For teams of 5–50 that want a managed service, Stackfield's paid plan is typically the lowest-cost managed option in the European set; Wire's enterprise pricing is higher per seat due to the E2E security posture. Exact rates vary by team size, so confirm current pricing on each vendor's page.
Is there a GDPR-compliant Slack alternative that supports federation or self-hosting?
Element/Matrix (5/5) is the strongest answer here. The Matrix protocol is federated by design: you can self-host your own Matrix homeserver on any EU cloud (Scaleway, OVH, Hetzner) and still communicate with other Matrix users on other servers. Element is the commercial cloud-hosted entry point; the self-hosted path is well-documented and widely used in European public-sector procurement. Mattermost is also self-hostable and EU-cloud-deployable, though it does not yet have a primary listing on this page due to its US corporate base.
Can my team keep using the same Salesforce CRM integration if we leave Slack?
Slack has a native Salesforce integration built by Salesforce themselves. If you migrate to Stackfield, Element, or Wire, the native connector is replaced by a Zapier or Make webhook-based integration, or by a custom microservice if your Salesforce usage is enterprise-grade. For teams leaving both Salesforce and Slack simultaneously, the CRM migration should be planned separately; see the Salesforce alternatives page for the parallel decision.
METHODOLOGY

How we verified each row above.

For every product we read the public DPA, sub-processors document, hosting region declaration, and corporate ownership records. Each is timestamped. Compliance score is editorial, re-verified quarterly. We never accept self-attestation.

Reviewed by the EU Vetted editorial team · Editorial guidelines

Last verified May 2026

Read methodology →